Results on the full 300-case held-out test set, ranked by mean Dice per case. Click a metric's column header to rank by that metric instead, or click any row for its per-category breakdown. New submissions are evaluated automatically and appear here once scored.
Registration is open. All submissions are made here, through the Register & Submit form below — create an account, register your team, then submit your predictions as a Google Drive link. This is the only submission channel.
The submission guidelines are a reference for the required prediction format only — they are not a separate way to submit. Review them so your predictions are formatted correctly, then submit through the form below.
ReXGroundingCT is a 3D chest CT dataset linking free-text radiology findings to pixel-level segmentations, built on the CT-RATE dataset of non-contrast chest CT scans paired with radiology reports. It enables sentence-level grounding for both focal and non-focal lung and pleural abnormalities across 14 categories.
This leaderboard evaluates models that localize a radiology finding described in natural language as a precise 3D segmentation mask, on a 300-case held-out test set.
Models are evaluated on free-text finding grounding: a model receives a CT volume and a natural-language finding from a radiology report and must output a 3D segmentation mask corresponding to that description. Fixed-category (class-based) segmentation that cannot separate two findings in different locations is out of scope.
Findings span 14 categories covering both typically non-focal abnormalities (bronchial wall thickening, bronchiectasis, emphysema, septal thickening, micronodules, and other diffuse abnormalities) and typically focal abnormalities (linear opacities, atelectasis/consolidation, ground-glass opacities, pulmonary nodules/masses, pleural effusion/thickening, honeycombing, pneumothorax, and other focal findings).
| Split | Cases | Annotations |
|---|---|---|
| Training | 2,992 CT scans | Partial-instance (up to 3 instances per finding) |
| Validation | 200 CT scans | Exhaustive (all instances segmented by radiologists) |
| Test | 300 CT scans | Exhaustive (all instances segmented by radiologists) |
All annotations are pixel-level 3D segmentation masks linked to free-text findings extracted from radiology reports. Validation and test sets are annotated exclusively by board-certified radiologists.
Ranking metric: mean Dice per case on the full 300-case test set. Each case's findings are averaged first, then cases are averaged with equal weight.
Overlap-based metrics:
Distance-based metrics:
For questions about the leaderboard, please contact Mohammed Baharoon.
ReXGroundingCT:
@article{baharoon2026rexgroundingct,
title={ReXGroundingCT: A 3D Chest CT Dataset for Segmentation of Findings from Free-Text Reports},
author={Baharoon, Mohammed and Luo, Luyang and Moritz, Michael and Kumar, Abhinav and Kim, Sung Eun and Zhang, Xiaoman and Zhu, Miao and Alabbad, Mahmoud Hussain and Alhazmi, Maha Sbayel and Mistry, Neel P and others},
journal={NEJM AI},
pages={AIdbp2501220},
year={2026},
publisher={Massachusetts Medical Society}
}
CT-RATE:
@article{hamamci2026generalist,
title={Generalist foundation models from a multimodal dataset for 3D computed tomography},
author={Hamamci, Ibrahim Ethem and Er, Sezgin and Wang, Chenyu and Almas, Furkan and Simsek, Ayse Gulnihan and Esirgun, Sevval Nil and Dogan, Irem and Durugol, Omer Faruk and Hou, Benjamin and Shit, Suprosanna and others},
journal={Nature Biomedical Engineering},
pages={1--19},
year={2026},
publisher={Nature Publishing Group UK London}
}
Every submission made during the ReXGroundingCT Challenge @ MICCAI 2026, with the challenge description and timeline, is archived on the challenge archive page.